• Español
  • Français
Harvest Strategies logo
 
Menu
  • Home
  • Harvest Strategies
    • What are HS?
    • Management Objectives
    • Reference Points
    • Harvest Control Rules
    • Glossary
    • HS Resources
    • Scientific Publications
  • MSE
    • Management Strategy Evaluation
    • Presenting MSE Results
      • Data Visualization Tools
      • Slide Templates
      • Shiny App
  • HS Around the World
    • Interactive Map of HS
    • RFMO HS Web Page
    • RFMO HS Management Measures
    • RFMO HS Dialogue Groups
    • 2022 RFMO HS Calendar
  • Press
    • Blog
    • News
    • Contact
  • Français
  • Español

Reference Points

What are reference points?

Reference points are benchmarks used to compare the current status of a fishery management system against a desirable (or undesirable) state. When matched to the management objectives for a fishery, they can be used to assess progress toward meeting those objectives.


Types of reference points:

  • Limit reference points (LRPs, or Blim and Flim): A benchmark that defines an undesirable biological state of the stock. To keep the stock safe, the probability of violating an LRP should be very low. However, if an LRP is violated, immediate action—such as a suspension of fishing—should be taken to return the stock or fishery to the target level.
  • Target reference points (TRPs, or BTARGET and FTARGET): A benchmark that defines the target fishery state that should be achieved and maintained. Creates a buffer zone to ensure that the limit reference point (LRP) is not breached. Can be based on one or more biological, ecological, social or economic considerations.
  • Trigger/threshold reference points: A benchmark that triggers a pre-defined management response to help the fishery remain close to the target reference point (TRP) and avoid breaching the limit reference point (LRP). Typically set between the TRP and the LRP.

Key Reference Point Principles in the U.N. Fish Stocks Agreement (UNFSA):

  • LRPs “constrain catches within safe biological limits”; risk of breaching LRP should be “very low”; “if a stock falls below LRP or is at risk of falling below such a reference point, conservation and management action should be initiated to facilitate stock recovery.”
  • Design management so that TRPs are achieved “on average.”
  • “Fishing mortality rate which generates maximum sustainable yield should be regarded as a minimum standard for limit reference points.”

Choosing Candidate Reference Points

Generally, TRPs and LRPs are divided into two categories: fishing mortality-based (F-based) and biomass-based (B-based). One key question that managers face is whether to use F-based and/or B-based reference points when setting targets and limits. Oftentimes, the answer is to use both because each has its pros and cons, as is further clarified below.

.

Fishing Mortality Based (F-Based)
  • F can be directly managed
  • Harder to understand, because F is a mortality rate that is intangible and cannot be directly observed

VS.

Biomass Based (B-Based)
  • B is the critical point to control from an ecological perspective, cannot be directly managed
  • Easy for managers and stakeholders to understand, because biomass is usually expressed as an absolute number that relates physically to the quantity of fish in the water

FACTSHEET: Reference Points; Language Options: Español 🇪🇸 • Français 🇫🇷 • 日本 🇯🇵 • ไทย 🇹🇭

Content provided by The Pew Charitable Trusts

TweetsOur latest tweets

Harvest Strategies Follow

The latest updates on the implementation of harvest strategies in fisheries across the globe 🐟🐟🐟

Hrvststrategies
hrvststrategies Harvest Strategies @hrvststrategies ·
26 Jan

Did you know a #HarvestStrategy can be an important tool to help fisheries adapt to #ClimateChange impacts? Check out this research published last month by a team at @BrenUCSB and @RutgersU that looks at how fisheries in the USA can better prepare https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/faf.12724

Reply on Twitter 1618400508796104704 Retweet on Twitter 1618400508796104704 9 Like on Twitter 1618400508796104704 19 Twitter 1618400508796104704
hrvststrategies Harvest Strategies @hrvststrategies ·
18 Jan

Wondering what might be in store for harvest strategies in 2023? Read our outlook here for the coming year and what we hope to see achieved! https://harveststrategies.org/blog/2023/01/17/for-2023-is-there-a-more-impressive-word-than-monumental/

#HarvestStrategy #SustainableFishing #SustainableFisheries

Reply on Twitter 1615726958637387776 Retweet on Twitter 1615726958637387776 Like on Twitter 1615726958637387776 2 Twitter 1615726958637387776
hrvststrategies Harvest Strategies @hrvststrategies ·
3 Jan

Happy new year! We're starting the year with a quick wrap-up on our blog of 2022 which was an incredible year for harvest strategies, but 2023 could be even better! #HarvestStrategy https://harveststrategies.org/blog/2022/12/23/annual-wrap-up-2022-was-a-monumental-year-for-harvest-strategies-2023-could-be-even-better/

Reply on Twitter 1610320548835516422 Retweet on Twitter 1610320548835516422 3 Like on Twitter 1610320548835516422 4 Twitter 1610320548835516422

Recent News

Tuna Commission adopts new management procedure for skipjack

December 12, 2022

Tuna Commission adopts new management procedure for skipjack

Via Radio New Zealand
The Ocean Foundation and FAO launch groundbreaking knowledge hub for fisheries management

November 3, 2022

The Ocean Foundation and FAO launch groundbreaking knowledge hub for fisheries management

Via FAO
WCPFC to vote on skipjack harvest strategy, PNA wants it to be non-binding

October 31, 2022

WCPFC to vote on skipjack harvest strategy, PNA wants it to be non-binding

Via SeafoodSource

Resources

Harvest strategies glossary

Harvest strategies glossary

Harvest strategies glossary

Resources

About Us

harveststrategies.org serves as a resource for fisheries scientists, managers, and other stakeholders, compiling information about how harvest strategies work and how implementing this pioneering management approach can lead to sustainable, profitable fisheries and successful recovery programs for many species around the world. The site is managed by The Ocean Foundation’s International Fisheries Conservation Project with support from The Pew Charitable Trusts and the Common Oceans Tuna Fisheries Project, which is funded by GEF and implemented by FAO.

Explore

  • The Basics
  • Case Studies
  • MSE
  • Glossary
  • News

Connect

  • Home
  • HS Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • The Ocean Foundation

Follow Us

  • © 2022 Harvest Strategies
  • Web design by 5W Infographics