• Español
  • Français
Harvest Strategies logo
 
Menu
  • Home
  • Harvest Strategies
    • What are Harvest Strategies
    • Management Objectives
    • Reference Points
    • Harvest Control Rules
    • Glossary
  • MSE
    • Management Strategy Evaluation
    • Presenting MSE Results
      • Data Visualization Tools
      • Slide Templates
      • Shiny App
  • HS Around the World
    • Interactive Map of HS
    • FAO Global HS for Tuna
    • RFMO HS Web Page
    • RFMO HS Management Measures
    • RFMO HS Dialogue Groups
  • Resources
    • Factsheets
    • Videos & Animations
    • Webinars
    • Blogs
    • Multilingual Resources
    • Scientific Publications
    • News
    • FAQs

  • Français
  • Español

Management Strategy Evaluation

VIDEO

Demystifying MSE: Management Strategy Evaluation

Video Language Options: Español 🇪🇸 • Français 🇫🇷 • Português 🇧🇷 • 汉语 🇨🇳 • 漢語 🇨🇳 • عربى 🇲🇦

What is management strategy evaluation?

Management strategy evaluation (MSE) is a tool that scientists and managers can use to simulate the workings of a fisheries system and test whether potential harvest strategies can achieve the pre-agreed management objectives. MSE helps to identify the harvest strategy likely to perform best, regardless of uncertainty, and balance trade-offs amid competing management objectives. The MSE in essence is the process of developing and agreeing to a harvest strategy and, unlike traditional assessment-based fisheries science, allows for collaboration between scientists, who do the bulk of the analytical and modeling work on the MSE, and managers, with the guidance of stakeholders.


MSE Step by Step

There are numerous ways to structure the MSE framework, but one or more operating models (OM) are at the center of the process. These operating models simulate all relevant aspects of the fisheries system and proposed harvest strategy. The OMs include all plausible hypotheses about the biology of the stock, such as recruitment, and aspects of the fishery, such as the level of illegal fishing activity. Because of the many combinations of assumptions, hundreds of scenarios are often tested.

The scientists who conduct the typical MSE modeling process will:

  1. Develop multiple OMs that reflect the different hypotheses about the possible states of nature (for example, plausible assumptions about natural mortality and reproductive potential). In this way, the many uncertainties are factored into the process.
  2. “Condition” the operating models by fitting the available real-world data—such as catch per unit effort data— to the OM in order to eliminate implausible scenarios.
  3. Use a “closed-loop simulation” to test the candidate harvest strategies. (See Figure 1.) That process entails:

━━━ a. Generating simulated fishery data (e.g., catch, indices of abundance) from the operating model.

━━━ b. Adding plausible levels of imprecision and bias using the “observation error model” to resemble what happens in a real-world fishery system.

━━━ c. Using the data from the observation error model to estimate stock status, either through a traditional stock assessment model or another approach.

━━━ d. Comparing the estimated stock status with the candidate harvest strategy to determine the management recommendation (e.g., quota, effort limit, size limit or time-area closure).

━━━ e. Subjecting the management recommendation to an analysis of possible implementation error, such as quota overages caused by illegal or unreported catch.

━━━ f. Feeding the output of the implementation error model back into the operating model in step 3A and repeating steps A through E iteratively for many years into the future.

  1. Compare the results of the closed-loop simulation with the performance indicators—quantitative expression of the management objectives—to determine which candidate harvest strategy balances trade-offs to best achieve the pre-agreed management objectives. 

.

.

Importantly, the MSE for a fishery can be updated as warranted. After HCRs are selected based on the results of the MSE, they are typically re-evaluated every three to five years and can be modified if they are not performing as expected, if “exceptional circumstances” that were not tested by the MSE occur or if new knowledge requires a revision of the operating models. Similarly, although MSE and harvest strategies decrease the reliance on traditional stock assessments, benchmark assessments are still typically conducted approximately every five years to ensure that the harvest strategy is performing as expected and to ground check the MSE.

FACTSHEET: Management Strategy Evaluation for Fisheries; Language Options: Español 🇪🇸 • Français 🇫🇷 • 日本 🇯🇵 • ไทย 🇹🇭 

Content Provided by The Pew Charitable Trusts

@harveststrategies.bsky.social

8 Followers 24 Following 17 Posts

 
  • Get to this post

    @harveststrategies.bsky.social 2 hours

    As oceans change, fisheries must adapt. A new guest blog by , Dr. Emily Klein and Dr. Ellen Ward, explores how harvest strategies can build climate resilience in global fisheries.
    #Fisheries #ClimateChange #HarvestStrategies #MSE

    harveststrategies.org/blog/2025/06...
  • Get to this post

    @harveststrategies.bsky.social 1 week

    Pacific bluefin tuna was once down to just 2% of its unfished level. Now, recovery is within reach and countries can secure it for the long term. Next month’s meeting in Japan could secure a long-term, science-based future. Read our latest blog to learn more! harveststrategies.org/blog/2025/06...
  • Get to this post

    @harveststrategies.bsky.social 1 week

    Join us for the next webinar!
    Ensuring Fair Winds: How Management Procedures Can Protect Seafood Markets
    📅 July 22 | 🕐 13:00 EDT | 2 hrs
    Discover why seafood companies are championing MPs and precautionary, science-based fishery management.
    us06web.zoom.us/meeting/regi...

Recent blogs

Cc Litreview

June 30, 2025

Guest Blog – Fisheries Management in a Changing Ocean: How harvest strategies can help global fisheries adapt to climate change impacts

Read more
Pbf Blog

June 18, 2025

Making Headway & Headlines for the World’s Most Expensive Fish

Read more

May 30, 2025

Guest Blog: Navigating a Changing Ocean – How Science is Helping Secure North Pacific Saury

Read more

Resources

Factsheets

Factsheets

Glossary

glossary

About Us

HarvestStrategies.org serves as a resource for fisheries scientists, managers, and other stakeholders, compiling information about how harvest strategies work and how implementing this pioneering management approach can lead to sustainable, profitable fisheries and successful recovery programs for many species around the world. The site is managed by The Ocean Foundation’s International Fisheries Conservation Project with support from The Pew Charitable Trusts and the Common Oceans Tuna Fisheries Project, which is funded by GEF and implemented by FAO.

Explore

  • The Basics
  • Case Studies
  • HS Blog
  • MSE
  • Glossary
  • FAQs
  • News

Connect

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • The Ocean Foundation

Follow Us

  • Follow us on BlueSky
  • Subscribe to our Youtube channel
  • Visit our LinkedIn profile
  • © 2025 Harvest Strategies
  • Privacy Policy
Harvest Strategy Tracker
Status Description
This item has been adopted
This item is in development
This item is behind / stalled
This item has not been started yet
Sign Up For Our Webinars!

    This Can Be The Current Webinar