• ES
  • FR
Harvest Strategies logo
 
Menu
  • Home
  • Harvest Strategies
    • What are HS?
    • Management Objectives
    • Reference Points
    • Harvest Control Rules
    • Glossary
    • HS Resources
    • Scientific Publications
  • MSE
    • Management Strategy Evaluation
    • Presenting MSE Results
      • Data Visualization Tools
      • Slide Templates
      • Shiny App
  • HS Around the World
    • Interactive Map of HS
    • RFMO HS Web Page
    • RFMO HS Management Measures
    • RFMO HS Dialogue Groups
    • 2022 RFMO HS Calendar
  • Press
    • Blog
    • News
    • Contact

Management Strategy Evaluation

VIDEO

Demystifying MSE: Management Strategy Evaluation

Video Language Options: Español 🇪🇸 • Français 🇫🇷 • Português 🇧🇷 • 汉语 🇨🇳 • 漢語 🇨🇳

What is management strategy evaluation?

Management strategy evaluation (MSE) is a tool that scientists and managers can use to simulate the workings of a fisheries system and test whether potential harvest strategies can achieve the pre-agreed management objectives. MSE helps to identify the harvest strategy likely to perform best, regardless of uncertainty, and balance trade-offs amid competing management objectives. The MSE in essence is the process of developing and agreeing to a harvest strategy and, unlike traditional assessment-based fisheries science, allows for collaboration between scientists, who do the bulk of the analytical and modeling work on the MSE, and managers, with the guidance of stakeholders.


MSE Step by Step

There are numerous ways to structure the MSE framework, but one or more operating models (OM) are at the center of the process. These operating models simulate all relevant aspects of the fisheries system and proposed harvest strategy. The OMs include all plausible hypotheses about the biology of the stock, such as recruitment, and aspects of the fishery, such as the level of illegal fishing activity. Because of the many combinations of assumptions, hundreds of scenarios are often tested.

The scientists who conduct the typical MSE modeling process will:

  1. Develop multiple OMs that reflect the different hypotheses about the possible states of nature (for example, plausible assumptions about natural mortality and reproductive potential). In this way, the many uncertainties are factored into the process.
  2. “Condition” the operating models by fitting the available real-world data—such as catch per unit effort data— to the OM in order to eliminate implausible scenarios.
  3. Use a “closed-loop simulation” to test the candidate harvest strategies. (See Figure 1.) That process entails:

━━━ a. Generating simulated fishery data (e.g., catch, indices of abundance) from the operating model. 

━━━ b. Adding plausible levels of imprecision and bias using the “observation error model” to resemble what happens in a real-world fishery system.

━━━ c. Using the data from the observation error model to estimate stock status, either through a traditional stock assessment model or another approach.

━━━ d. Comparing the estimated stock status with the candidate harvest strategy to determine the management recommendation (e.g., quota, effort limit, size limit or time-area closure). 

━━━ e. Subjecting the management recommendation to an analysis of possible implementation error, such as quota overages caused by illegal or unreported catch. 

━━━ f. Feeding the output of the implementation error model back into the operating model in step 3A and repeating steps A through E iteratively for many years into the future. 

  1. Compare the results of the closed-loop simulation with the performance indicators—quantitative expression of the management objectives—to determine which candidate harvest strategy balances trade-offs to best achieve the pre-agreed management objectives. 

.

.

Importantly, the MSE for a fishery can be updated as warranted. After HCRs are selected based on the results of the MSE, they are typically re-evaluated every three to five years and can be modified if they are not performing as expected, if “exceptional circumstances” that were not tested by the MSE occur or if new knowledge requires a revision of the operating models. Similarly, although MSE and harvest strategies decrease the reliance on traditional stock assessments, benchmark assessments are still typically conducted approximately every five years to ensure that the harvest strategy is performing as expected and to ground check the MSE.

FACTSHEET: Management Strategy Evaluation for Fisheries; Language Options: Español 🇪🇸 • Français 🇫🇷 • 日本 🇯🇵 • ไทย 🇹🇭 

Content Provided by The Pew Charitable Trusts

TweetsOur latest tweets

Harvest StrategiesFollow

Harvest Strategies
Retweet on TwitterHarvest Strategies Retweeted
PewEuropePew Europe@PewEurope·
20 May

Great news! This decision from the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission will help ensure a sustainable future for one of the world’s most valuable fish. https://twitter.com/Hrvststrategies/status/1527703367560179721

Harvest Strategies@Hrvststrategies

BREAKING NEWS: IOTC has officially adopted a management procedure for bigeye tuna, marking the first full MP for any tropical tuna species at a tRFMO. Congratulations IOTC for championing the harvest strategy approach!
https://tinyurl.com/2s35r8u9

Reply on Twitter 1527709540778655746Retweet on Twitter 15277095407786557463Like on Twitter 15277095407786557469Twitter 1527709540778655746
HrvststrategiesHarvest Strategies@Hrvststrategies·
20 May

La CTOI a officiellement adopté une procédure de gestion pour le thon obèse, adoptant ainsi la première procédure de gestion complète pour les thons tropicaux dans une ORGP thonière. Bravo à la CTOI d’avoir soutenu l’approche par stratégie de capture!
https://tinyurl.com/2s35r8u9

Reply on Twitter 1527704223097438208Retweet on Twitter 1527704223097438208Like on Twitter 1527704223097438208Twitter 1527704223097438208
HrvststrategiesHarvest Strategies@Hrvststrategies·
20 May

BREAKING NEWS: IOTC has officially adopted a management procedure for bigeye tuna, marking the first full MP for any tropical tuna species at a tRFMO. Congratulations IOTC for championing the harvest strategy approach!
https://tinyurl.com/2s35r8u9

Reply on Twitter 1527703367560179721Retweet on Twitter 152770336756017972118Like on Twitter 152770336756017972161Twitter 1527703367560179721

Recent News

European Seafood Market Stakeholders Urge Adoption of Science-Based, Sustainable Tuna Management in the Atlantic

May 19, 2022

European Seafood Market Stakeholders Urge Adoption of Science-Based, Sustainable Tuna Management in the Atlantic

Via globaltunaalliance.com
Ensuring blue growth for North Africa’s blue gold

May 19, 2022

Ensuring blue growth for North Africa’s blue gold

Via nawaat.org
La hora de una gestión sostenible de nuestro atún

May 19, 2022

La hora de una gestión sostenible de nuestro atún

Via elpais.com

Resources

Harvest strategies glossary

Harvest strategies glossary

Harvest strategies glossary

resources

About Us

harveststrategies.org serves as a resource for fisheries scientists, managers, and other stakeholders, compiling information about how harvest strategies work and how implementing this pioneering management approach can lead to sustainable, profitable fisheries and successful recovery programs for many species around the world. The site is managed by The Ocean Foundation’s International Fisheries Conservation Project.

Explore

  • The Basics
  • Case Studies
  • MSE
  • Glossary
  • News

Connect

  • Home
  • HS Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • The Ocean Foundation

Follow Us

  • © 2021 Harvest Strategies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Design by 5W Infographics